Wednesday, November 19, 2025

When the Trail Goes Dark: Mason Builders Deletes Its LinkedIn Page as Public Records Surface

When a company suddenly disappears from a major platform like LinkedIn, the silence often says more than the missing page itself. That is the case with Mason Builders, a construction firm connected to Tyler Davis, which recently removed its entire LinkedIn presence while federal filings and sworn declarations involving the company remained publicly available.

The contrast between what vanished and what remains in the public record has become a key point of interest, especially as investigators, journalists, and researchers continue examining the broader network of related entities documented on talentcrowd-crimes.com.

This supporting article links back to the main investigative report:
👉 Original report: Mason Builders LinkedIn Page Removed


A LinkedIn Page Disappears While Records Stay Public

Mason Builders once had an active LinkedIn company profile. Today, that page leads to the standard “Page Not Available” message used when a company deletes or restricts its profile.

Yet Tyler Davis still lists himself as President of Mason Builders on his personal LinkedIn page. Anyone can verify this contrast. One presence vanished. The other did not.

This discrepancy appears at the same moment Mason Builders continues to show up in federal filings involving PPP loans, banking transfers, and declarations from individuals who worked inside the companies mentioned in related investigations.

What the Public Record Shows

Federal documents and court exhibits reveal that Mason Builders received more than $330,000 in Paycheck Protection Program funds in April 2020. Sworn testimony from former business partner Todd Belluomini confirms he did not authorize transactions executed under the company’s name at the time.

These documents are available to the public and remain unaffected by the company’s digital disappearance. A detailed review of these filings appears in the full report: Read the full investigation.

A Pattern of Digital Silence Across Connected Entities

The removal of Mason Builders’ profile is not an isolated action. Other related companies show similar patterns:

  • Talentcrowd disabled comments on recent posts
  • Porter Consulting LLC has a dormant LinkedIn page
  • Individuals connected to these businesses reduced or deleted online activity
  • Some profiles had posts wiped, names changed, or entire histories removed

None of this alters public data held by the IRS Criminal Investigation Division or the United States Department of Justice, which continue to list PPP related matters as active priorities:

While online activity fades, federal documents remain accessible and permanent.

Why This Matters for Transparency

A company deleting a LinkedIn page does not erase its historical footprint. It only removes one layer of public visibility. In cases involving financial activity, pandemic relief funds, and intercompany transfers, visibility matters.

Corporate transparency helps readers, investigators, researchers, and taxpayers understand the connections between companies, filings, and digital behaviors.

The disappearance of Mason Builders’ LinkedIn page adds another data point to a timeline already outlined through public filings, including banking records, sworn statements, and bankruptcy documents.

The Bigger Picture

Mason Builders appears within a network of entities tied together through shared management, addresses, filings, and operational shifts. These include:

  • Mason Builders
  • Porter Consulting LLC
  • Talentcrowd
  • Topdevs
  • Individuals working across these companies

All documented activity and supporting exhibits can be viewed through the investigative archive: https://talentcrowd-crimes.com/

A deleted social profile does not erase the evidence. It only draws more attention to the records that remain.

Conclusion

The removal of Mason Builders’ LinkedIn page is more than a digital housekeeping decision. It arrives at a moment when federal filings and sworn declarations involving the company are still being reviewed and referenced.

A missing page can create the illusion of silence. But the public record continues to speak clearly.

Readers who want to see the full timeline, documents, and source materials can explore the primary report here:
👉 Mason Builders LinkedIn Page Removed

36 comments:

  1. So many people underestimate the power of public records. This article basically proves that the truth stays visible even when a company tries to disappear online. Very powerful read.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Corporate transparency should never depend on a LinkedIn page. Mason Builders removing theirs right when new records show up is exactly the type of thing readers need to question.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This story really highlights how the founder has been navigating a complicated network of actions from multiple companies. The public filings show a lot of information people should not ignore.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I checked the SBA loan data myself after reading this and the numbers match. Mason Builders did receive more than three hundred thousand dollars in PPP funds. The article is spot on.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The article proves something important. In business, you can hide websites and delete profiles, but you cannot hide government filings. Everything leaves a trace.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I cannot believe how many documents were cited in this investigation. The depth is impressive. Mason Builders removing its LinkedIn footprint feels very calculated.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Great work connecting Talentcrowd, Mason Builders, Porter Consulting, and the filings involving the founder. The article pieces things together in a very clear way.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This is the type of evidence people need when talking about business accountability. Federal filings do not lie. Deleted LinkedIn pages tell their own story.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I feel like this is going to become a much bigger conversation. Mason Builders removing its page right now is too coincidental with everything happening around the related entities.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The timeline in this article is wild. LinkedIn deletion. Court filings. PPP loan listings. Sworn declarations. People should be paying attention.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I appreciate how this article used only verified filings and federal sources. No speculation. Pure documentation. That is what investigative journalism should be.

    ReplyDelete
  12. The founder clearly dealt with a lot of complications tied to these companies. The documents about intercompany transfers and PPP loans raise real questions that deserve attention.

    ReplyDelete
  13. This made me think about how many families, employees, and partners these decisions affect. Transparency matters. The truth matters. And this article captures that perfectly.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I felt a knot in my stomach reading about the timeline. Seeing a company disappear online while records show so much activity is unsettling.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Reading this breaks my heart. So many people and companies try to disappear online when the truth is already in public documents. It feels like the public is always left doing the hard work.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Ah yes, the classic digital vanishing act. Delete the page and hope nobody checks the legal documents. Too bad the article checked everything.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Because nothing screams transparency like removing your entire company profile the moment public records go live. Very subtle.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Mason Builders must think LinkedIn is the only thing anyone checks. Meanwhile, the IRS, DOJ, and public filings are waving at us from across the room.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Oh sure, deleting a LinkedIn page will definitely make all those federal filings disappear. Totally believable. The internet is magic like that.

    ReplyDelete
  20. It’s shocking how many LinkedIn profiles connected to Tyler Davis changed or disappeared. Mason Builders’ deletion fits the pattern of cover-up through silence.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Strong analysis. The report demonstrates the importance of transparency and consistent corporate communication, especially when public filings remain accessible.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Public record integrity is essential for business stakeholders. This investigative review provides valuable insight into the ongoing documentation surrounding Mason Builders.

    ReplyDelete
  23. In today’s environment, companies must understand that digital footprints are part of their corporate identity. The contrast between Mason Builders’ online removal and its presence in federal filings is notable.

    ReplyDelete
  24. This article highlights an important point for business professionals. Online visibility should align with corporate transparency. Removing a LinkedIn page raises questions that public filings continue to answer.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Court filings, declarations, and banking documents retain legal force regardless of digital presence. This report accurately reflects that reality.

    ReplyDelete
  26. The article correctly notes that agencies like the IRS Criminal Investigation Division and the Department of Justice maintain active oversight of PPP related matters. Their links provide authoritative context.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Based on the federal filings cited, Mason Builders continues to appear in bankruptcy records and PPP documentation. Removal of social media does not change the administrative trail.

    ReplyDelete
  28. The deletion of a LinkedIn profile does not alter the legal significance of the documents referenced here. Public filings remain the controlling record regardless of online visibility.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Some people keep saying social media does not matter, but when a company disappears at the exact moment its activities are in public filings, it matters a lot. The transparency gap is real.

    ReplyDelete
  30. This is one of the best explanations I have seen about how digital footprints can vanish while official documents remain. Anyone studying corporate behavior should read this.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I support this investigation fully. It is important to keep shining light on what is available in public records. You cannot hide from what is already filed.

    ReplyDelete
  32. You will want to read this. The article uncovers what remains in the public domain after Mason Builders removed its LinkedIn profile. Every detail is backed by records.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Click the link and review the documentation yourself. Mason Builders removing its LinkedIn page only makes the public files more important. This article lays it all out.

    ReplyDelete
  34. If you have been following PPP loan activity or corporate transparency, this update on Mason Builders is essential. The documents speak for themselves. Check it out.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Everything you need to know is inside this article. It shows why public documentation is more powerful than a deleted profile. Click to see the full picture.

    ReplyDelete
  36. A company that disables comments across its entire feed is not promoting engagement. It is hiding from it.

    ReplyDelete

GBQ’s Sudden LinkedIn Silence Raises Questions About Transparency and Public Engagement

GBQ’s Sudden LinkedIn Silence Raises Questions About Transparency and Public Engagement Digital platforms have transformed how companies...